The Firehose Approach
Four hours of features, clicks, and screenshots. Too much information, no context, no time to absorb. By Monday, people remember 10% of what they saw.
You've invested in a system. Your team has been "trained." And six months later, half of them are back to spreadsheets and workarounds. Sound familiar? The problem isn't your people. It's training that doesn't stick. I fix that.
Best for organizations where technology investments aren't translating to adoption
Training budgets get spent. Sessions get delivered. Boxes get checked. And then reality happens, and reality doesn't match the training manual.
Four hours of features, clicks, and screenshots. Too much information, no context, no time to absorb. By Monday, people remember 10% of what they saw.
Generic training designed by people who've never done the job. "Best practices" that don't match your workflows. Examples that don't look like your data.
Training happens at launch. Then the system evolves, new people join, processes change, and there's no mechanism to keep skills current.
Questions arise after training ends. But there's no one to ask, or the person who delivered training has moved on. Small confusions compound into big workarounds.
People log into the system (you can see the metrics). But logging in isn't using. Real adoption means the system is where work happens, not a chore people complete before returning to their actual tools.
Every session uses your data, your processes, your scenarios. Participants practice doing their actual job in the system, not following along with generic exercises.
Some people learn by doing. Some need to see the big picture first. Some want reference materials to consult later. Good training accommodates all of them.
One-time training fades. I create follow-up structures like check-ins, quick reference materials, and office hours that reinforce learning and catch problems before they become habits.
I'm not teaching from a vendor manual. I've been the person figuring out how to make the system work for my actual job. That empathy changes how I train.
Your team can do their jobs in the new system from day one, not just navigate menus
Consistent, efficient onboarding that doesn't depend on whoever happens to be available
New capabilities actually get used, not just announced
Internal capability that reduces dependence on external support
A second chance that actually works
90%+
reported confidence in system use post-training
40%
reduction in support requests
2x
faster time to productivity for new hires
20+
training programs delivered
People don't just log in. They work in the system. Because training taught them to do their actual job, not just navigate menus.
New hires contribute sooner. System rollouts realize value faster. The gap between "trained" and "productive" shrinks dramatically.
When people know how to use the system properly, they need less help. Your power users and IT team get time back.
Everyone learns the same best practices. Data gets entered consistently. Processes get followed. The benefits of standardization actually materialize.
Prior training didn't stick — team reverted to old habits or spreadsheets
New hires take too long to become productive in the system
System is stable (not broken — training can't fix a bad system)
Leadership will support and enforce adoption expectations
It depends on scope. A focused session on a new feature might be 2 hours. A comprehensive rollout program might span several weeks with multiple sessions. I'll scope it based on your actual needs, not a standard package.
Free 30-minute call
Whether you're planning a new rollout, fixing failed adoption, or building internal capability, a 30-minute conversation will clarify what you need. You'll get honest assessment of your situation and practical recommendations.